PHIL 1301: Introduction to Philosophy
The ACC catalogue describes this course as "A study of the nature of philosophy and various traditions. Includes a study of major western philosophers, philosophical problems, and critical thinking."
PHIL 1301 Outcomes
My theme for this semesters exploration of philosophy is "Human Knowledge and Reality." We will consider some of the major issues involved in metaphysics and epistemology, focusing on the ultimate nature of reality and the relation between any such reality and human knowledge.
There are no prerequisites for Introduction to Philosophy. A passing score or the equivalent on the reading portion of the TASP is required, and I highly recommend a passing score or the equivalent on the writing portion. The major form of evaluation will be written work, and the main instructional methods will include readings and email discussion.
Internet access, including an email account, is highly recommended. You may submit written work and conduct other course business by means of email and the web pages for your section. (To find the main page for your section, go back to the top of this page and click on your section number.) Consult the General Course Policies for details on sending email.
Our objectives for the semester reflect the goals listed above: demonstration of improved critical thinking skills, familiarity with the basic problems and concepts of philosophical thought, improved understanding of our philosophical tradition, and a working knowledge of the theories we will study. The major form of assessment will be writing assignments (essays).
Please refer to my main page for office hours.
Texts and Reading Assignments
I will post reading assignments in the "classroom" (a password-protected page). I expect everyone to read and think about the assignment. Reading philosophy takes tenacity; expect to spend several hours a week working through the readings. The major texts for the course are
Texts marked with an asterisk are are available on line; I will post links to these texts on the reading assignments page. These texts are also available in many bookstore(s), if you prefer to do your readings off-line. The recommended text is an entertaining overview of the history of philosophy (with explanations of most of the major figures). It may be helpful in filling in gaps or as a resource for your coursework (and paper topics!).
For each reading assignment, study questions to help you work through the text. Links to reading assignments, study questions, lectures, and other handouts will be found on the reading assignment page. Be sure to g if you are having problems with the course content.
Your grade for this course will be based on written work demonstrating the pursuit of the goals of the course. The application essays form the basic component and are required of all students, . You may complete additional components for a higher grade, as indicated in the following table:
In any case, the average of your grades will determine the course grade. (For example, if you completed the application essays, the analytical paper, and the research essay, but your average is a B, your course grade will still be a B.) The grading criteria chart gives a detailed exposition of how I evaluate each assignment.
Due dates for written work will be posted and announced in class; please check the main page for your section regularly for announcements and deadlines. Please note that I will not accept work after the stated due date, except by prior agreement. Consult the Course Policies for details
The main theme of the five essays is the Melissa/Melinda quandary and the ways in which the philosophers we are studying may contribute to their deliberation. I will give you a topic for each essay, consisting of several questions regarding the application of the theories we are studying to the Melissa/Melinda quandary. The point of the essay is not merely to answer the questions, but primarily to justify your answers, using reasons drawn from the texts and from your reflections on these theories. These essays should be 250-300 words (about 1 1/5 typed, double-spaced pages).
For fans of Bloom's taxonomy, the essays begin at the knowledge and comprehension levels and move beyond comprehension to application (at least).
This assignment is an opportunity to analyze a philosophical problem in some detail (500-600 words, or about two typed, double-spaced pages). I will assign the topic, which will be derived from our readings and which will involve comparing and contrasting particular approaches to a major philosophical issue. Again the central idea is justification of your conclusions based on your understanding of the texts. I will include further instructions in the assignment.
On Bloom's taxonomy, I will be looking for work at the analysis level.
The paper will be a 1000-word (four-page) exploration of a specific philosophical question relating to the theme of the course. For a detailed discussion of this assignment, see the Research Essay help page. Topics for the research essay are to some extent negotiable, so please do not hesitate to contact me about your interests if you don't find something in the assignment.
Please note that, if you decide to complete a research essay, I am requiring that you hand in a topic question and a rough draft. See the main page for your course for due dates. Also note that I am not stipulating a particular format for this paper; any standard format for term papers is acceptable (MLA, for instance). However, (1) you must use some recognizable format and you must be consistent, and (2) the format will have to be adjusted somewhat for email delivery.
This assignment should operate at the analysis/synthesis level of Bloom's taxonomy.
It may seem odd for me to say this, but the assigned readings are, in fact, a required course component. I do try to make these philosophers' arguments more clear in my lectures, but they are not intended as a substitute for reading and thinking through what they say in their own words. In fact, one of the points of this course is to get some exposure to our philosophical tradition. How would you rate a poetry course that didn't involve reading any actual poetry? Or a music appreciation course that didn't involve listening to any music? It would be absurd to think that you had been "introduced" to poetry or music, right? So, don't forget your readings! (And don't forget my warning: do not rely strictly on my lectures in your written work!)
The Discussion Page
You will have free access to a discussion page for your course. This page is designed to allow students to discuss the material, ask questions, etc. I will monitor the discussion and comment when appropriate, but the basic idea is to give students a forum for collaboration.Consequently, I will not evaluate or grade the conversations and, although I recommend participation, you will not receive a grade for participating in them. I will encourage you to engage other students in such conversation: if you find something difficult, chances are someone else in the class is having a similar reaction.
After each of the application essays, I will post general comments about the essay question and course material on the discussion page. This will provide some additional feedback and guidance (and discussion) of the application essays.
Check the main page for your section frequently for due dates, announcements, and links to the schedule of readings and coursework..
This page was last updated 03/01/2009 07:09:02 PM by mdaude.